Monday, 17 June 2024

Mick Jagger & The Magic Of His Charisma

Please allow him to introduce himself. He’s a man of wealth and taste. The essence of Mick Jagger is all here in his six-minute epic 'Sympathy For The Devil'. His madman bravado. His seductive sneer. His androgynous glimmer. His satanic majesty. The way he cackles, “Mmmmmean it!” That conga beat. That “hoo-hoo” chant. The way he whoops along with Keith’s out-of-nowhere guitar solo. But most of all, the way he keeps daring you to chase him through that funhouse of mirrors he has for a soul, trying to figure him out, trying to hang a name on him, trying to guess the nature of his game. This song sums up why he’s the most elusive and unknowable of rock stars. But it also sums up why he’s the one who’s kept the whole world obsessed for all these years. Pleased to meet you. Hope you guessed his name. 

And, as Peter Whitehead revealed in a 1994 interview, the Stones’ front man primed him to expect action at the Royal Albert Hall. “Mick said, ‘I’ll tell you when I’ll get the girls up on stage.’ After a couple of songs, he turned around and said ‘Ready?’ and within 15 seconds the kids were on stage swinging around his neck. He’d toss a couple of girls off and he’d look around as if to say ‘Got enough?’ in the middle of singing this song. It’s demonic, it’s voodoo, it’s Satan.” 

So many adjectives have been linked to Jagger: Aristocratic, bitchy, upper class, ladies man, child support, legal bills, court dates, alimony, fame suckers, hangers-on, intellectual property, bitchy, London parasites, starring into the mirror, narcissist, disco's, scenesters, models, groupies, socialites, speed freaks, phonies, poseurs, debauchery, decadent, vanity, mass media, leisure industry complex, prince of darkness, steal your soul, bitchy songs, satanic majesty, androgynous, funhouse of mirrors, urban decay, moral depravity, desolation, economics, high class pimp, fame and fortune, imperialism, combat zones, jaded rouè, showgirl, mystic crystal revelations, acid trip, alienation, apocalypse,  violence on the streets, pilage and burning thats its hard to pin him down. 

On the song Prodigal Son country-blues sermon from the Rev. Robert Wilkins, transmuted into the strange love between these two blood brothers. It’s the Bible story of the rich man’s heir who goes crawling back home in shame. But Mick has no ability to feel shame, or even surprise — he never had a doubt they’d take him back. At the end, Keith lets out a hearty “heeey!,” as if he’s so caught up in the story — and in this musical mind-meld — he can’t help himself. On Gimme Shelter he said “That’s a kind of end-of-the-world song, really. It’s apocalypse; the whole record’s like that,” Jagger tells Rolling Stone’s Jann S. Wenner. “It’s a very rough, very violent era. The Vietnam War. Violence on the screens. Pillage and burning.” But somehow, the song feels even more terrifying today. 

Something Happened to Me Yesterday is a good example of Mick capturing the times. In the heyday of mystic-crystal revelations of 1967, Mick goes deep on an acid trip that leaves him more alienated — and more hilariously English — than ever. David Bowie basically founded his career on this song, especially the moment where Mick muses, “You’re talking in a most peculiar way.” In that moment, you can hear “Space Oddity” and all that followed. 

The early days of music video. “Hang Fire” is a zero-budget one-take quickie — no props, no concept, just five rock stars herded into a hallway for a couple of minutes of awesomely inept lip-synching. (Woody maybe had a little too much sugar in his tea this morning.) But Mick minces like a showgirl with the rent due, especially the moment where he sneaks up to a giant picture of himself to give it a great big kiss.

Micks bares his soul in ‘Too Tough’ in 1983, on a startlingly candid song hidden on the Undercover album, where Mick dishes the dirt about how lonely it feels being a jaded roué with a heart of stone. He spots one of his old flames while he’s flipping channels, no doubt in some five-star hotel. As he sings, “I saw you on TV last night in a rerun soap/You were young and beautiful, already without hope.” He wonders why he’s doomed to live his life this way. Then he goes right on living his life this way.

The Stones hit the ground running in the Eighties, with one of their leanest, meanest, funkiest hits. Mick rails against Reagan-era U.S. imperialism, ranting, “One hundred thousand disparus/Lost in the jails of South America.” The band mix the Clash, Grandmaster Flash, Lee Perry, and Duran Duran into their own electro-throb groove. Like so many Stones classics, it’s a boogie through a combat zone. In the video, Keith plays the kidnapper who pulls a gun on Mick — he’d probably spent years waiting for that moment.

Mick’s movie career has led him to some very strange places, but he’s brilliant in the Hollywood melodrama The Man From Elysian Fields’ in 2001, as a high-class pimp running a posh male-escort service. In a fancy restaurant, he confesses to Angelica Huston that fame and fortune is meaningless without true love. “If you don’t use success to enrich your life, then you’re just putting failure into Gucci shoes.” She laughs in his face. Mick never expresses this sentiment ever again.

As a student at the London School of Economics, a nice boy named Mike Jagger changes his name, to conjure up a little faux-Irish salt-of-the-earth street cred. Result: one of the all-time great rock-star names. His family keeps calling him “Mike” for the rest of their lives. 

In the star-studded chaos of the Stones’ brilliant concert film Rock and Roll Circus, Mick has a heart-to-heart sitdown with John Lennon. They reminisce about their early days together, calling each other “Michael” and “Winston,” but the tension is electric. “He said a lot of sort of tarty things about the Beatles,” John tells Rolling Stone in 1970, “which I am hurt by, because you know, I can knock the Beatles, but don’t let Mick Jagger knock them. I would like to just list what we did and what the Stones did two months after on every fuckin’ album. Every fuckin’ thing we did, Mick does exactly the same — he imitates us. And I would like one of you fuckin’ underground people to point it out.

Welcome to New York — it’s been waiting for you. Or as Mick would phrase it, “Go ahead, bite the Big Apple! Don’t mind the maggots!” “Shattered” is one of the nastiest, funniest NYC travelogues ever, with Mick bitching about urban decay and moral depravity, from the pimps on Seventh Avenue to the rats on the West Side to the bedbugs uptown. And he wouldn’t be anywhere else. “Shattered” comes at the all-time peak of America’s 1970s obsession with hating New York, in the aftermath of the Summer of Sam, upping the punk-rock ante on CBGB in a riot of “shedooby” chants and guitar sludge. Suggested slogan for the NYC Tourism Bureau: “Pride and joy and greed and sex, that’s what makes our town the best!”

When Jagger & Bowie collaborated on a comedy genius dance-off, two of the proudest rock divas ever face off to strut their stuff, both out for blood. Jagger and Bowie try to top each other, stealing each other’s moves, wiggling their jazz hands and shaking their asses. Funniest moment: While David does his prancing, Mick bends down to grab his beer, takes a swig, then goes back into battle with Bowie. Who wins? We all do

Just when it looked like the Stones were going to fade away into professional rock smarm, Mick saved their bacon with Some Girls, an album of mega-bitchy songs about losing his mind in New York City, in the aftermath of his marriage. It’s their most Mick-dominated album — and their all-time bestseller. In the hit “Miss You,” he faces up to the kind of heartbreak he’s spent his life dancing around, wandering through the city, shuffling barefoot through the street, with total strangers asking, “What’s the matter witchoo, boy?”

Michael Lindsay-Hogg directed Jumping Jack Flash, the revolutionary clip of Mick leading the Stones through their new hit. The Prince of Darkness dances up to the camera, war paint on his face. He does his insolent stare right into your eyes and steals your very soul. His green velvet suit is open in front, with a tattoo of a clock on his chest. He does all the Mick moves you’ve seen so many times, but never scarier than they are right now. Charlie and Bill are done up in mascara. Mick and Brian glower in their shades. It’s the most jolting footage of Mick in action, even though there’s no nudity, no violence, nothing at all but him lost in this song. He’s here to ruin your world. He’s here to warp your mind. He’s up to no good and he absolutely means it.

Nobody’s ever described Mick better than Greil Marcus in his classic Mystery Train: “His songs are loud, brutal and mean, containing feelings you like to pretend you do not have, recollections you would like to forget, and temptations that up until now you have wisely avoided.” That’s all here in “Satisfaction,” where he’s just another product of the leisure-industrial complex, defined by mass media and cigarette ads and sexual consumerism.

Carly Simon definitely chose the right backup singer for her Number One smash “You’re So Vain.” Mick proves why he’s Mr. Love in Vain — because he’s so in love with being vain. You can hear him singing along with Carly in the chorus — “You’re so vain! I bet you think this song is about you! Don’t you? Don’t you? Don’t you?” Mick sings the way you can only sing if you sincerely believe every song is about you.

On the tune Sway the change has come. It’s the Seventies, and Mick is so awash in debauchery he can barely enunciate his words, creating a hypnotic haze with the incantation, “It’s just that demon life has got me in its sway.” The younger, more innocent Mick in the band — new guitar recruit Mick Taylor — plays all the guitar himself, making “Sway” the Stones song that’s officially too decadent for Keith.

Ride On Baby is a lethal satire from Flowers, a concept album about all the hip young scenesters flocking around Mick in the London of 1966: artists, models, groupies, socialites, phonies, speed freaks, poseurs. Mick has nothing but bad news for these people. “Ride On, Baby” kisses them off, with Brian Jones’ harpsichord-and-marimba groove. The music is glam but ominous, as Mick moves in for the kill, sneering, “By the time you’re 30, gonna look 65/You won’t look pretty and your friends will have kissed you goodbye.” How can this song hit so hard yet remain so obscure all these years.

Doncha Bother Me” is the bitchiest moment on the 1966 classic Aftermath — which is quite an achievement. Mick sneers at all the London parasites, hangers-on, imitators, fame-suckers, assuring them that they’ll never catch up to him. Ever the innovator, he also makes sure they can’t lay a finger on his intellectual property

Mick's Studio 54 obsession pays off in “Emotional Rescue,” a comedy goof that somehow flukes its way to the top of the charts. He knocks it off late one night, just for kicks and giggles, ad-libbing an outrageous falsetto-disco vamp on electric piano, with Woody on bass and Charlie on drums. He makes up the arched-eyebrow sex monologue on the spot, promising, “I will be your knight in shining aaarmooour.” To his shock, it blows up into an international dance hit. As he tells Rolling Stone, “It’s just one of those recording-studio things. You would never really write a song like that in real life.

There is practically nothing going on in this tune except Mick staring into a mirror and falling deeply in lust with his own lascivious charms, which is why he can sound so self-parodic yet so authentically lecherous at the same time. (Like so many of his sex songs, it’s all about him, with barely a glance at his alleged muse.) By the end, Mick’s screaming, “I’m the burning bush! I’m the burning fire! I’m the bleeding volcano.

No other rock & roll singer could have gotten away with this teary ballad, but Mick relishes the role of a forlorn aristocrat, weeping over his lost childlike innocence. (Talk about a distant memory.) He and Keith originally wrote it for Marianne Faithful, but it takes Mick’s fab arrogance to put it over the top, as he sobs, “My riches can’t buy everything.

On Some Girls the title song Mick reveals the dirty details of playing the ladies’ man, for any fans out there who wish they could be him. He introduces the kids in the audience to exciting new concepts like child support, social diseases, alimony, court dates, legal bills — and lets them all know they can’t afford.

The deep cut Backstreet Girl feom 1967 is scathing portrait of male vanity — always Mick’s  specialty, and always his favorite target for his mean streak. A gorgeous accordion waltz about a hypocritical upper-class snob and his secret working-class mistress, as he talks down to her: “Please take the favors I grant/Curtsy and act nonchalant.

This honky-tonk hoedown groove gets raunchier as it goes along, as Mick tarts it up with his sluttiest schoolgirl gasps over Keith’s guitar. He urges you to rest your weary head on his breasts, and ends up begging you to splash your bodily fluids all over him. In 1969, when the Stones’ music was full of dread and doom, “Let It Bleed” was a moment where the sex drive could win out over the death drive. Even if the song gives you the suspicion that Mick Jagger’s one true erotic obsession will always be Mick Jagger.

On the TAMI SHOW in 1964 he’s got the toughest job in this legendary concert film: He has to go on after James Brown. The Stones begged to play before JB, since nobody in showbiz could top his “Night Train” dance, or his “Please, Please, Please” routine of fighting his way back to the microphone. But Jagger jumps out there and boogies for his life, mincing and swiveling through “It’s All Over Now.”

A soulful guitar ballad about adult heartache. But the money moment is when Mick licks his lips and slips into his falsetto reverie about “pretty-pretty-pretty-pretty girrrrrls.” It’s like he can’t wait for the chance to transform himself into the prettiest girl of them all. (Pretty-pretty! Such a pretty!) It inspired one of the all-time best Stones covers, from the punk band Wild Flag, with the dueling guitars and falsettos of Sleater-Kinney’s Carrie Brownstein and Helium’s Mary Timony.

Mick has brought down the house at 30 Rock so many times: belting “Shattered” in 1978, seeing Jimmy Fallon in the mirror in 2001, karaokeing “Moves Like Jagger” in 2012. But his greatest SNL hit has to be this Weekend Update appearance, with Mike Myers in 1992 playing Mick and Mick all pirated up to play a zonked-out Keith. It’s a Point/Counterpoint debate on controversial rap lyrics, Ice-T, and censorship. Mick-as-Keith just mumbles incomprehensibly, behind his shades, headband, and cigarette. His best punchline: “Mick, you ignorant slut.”

In his comedy special Kid Gorgeous, Mulaney gives a hilarious description of his week of agony when Mick hosted SNL, shooting down his ideas for jokes. “Never to your face does a British billionaire in leather pants go ‘not funnaaaaay!’” When the two write a song together for a sketch, Mulaney has to ask, “Motherfucker, is this how you write songs? Just one word at a time, with verbal abuse?”

Mick wears wizard hat on the cover of ‘Their Satanic Majesties Request'.  The Stones tried to go psychedelic in this zany Sgt. Pepper’s omelette, which they quickly disavowed. But Satanic Majesties has always been one of their most underrated records, simply because it’s one of their most Mick records. He absolutely kills it in the dystopian sci-fi blues of “The Lantern,” “Citadel,” and “2000 Man,” a totally accurate prediction of our modern world’s doom-scrolling bait-clicking phone addiction.

The climax of one of the darkest, scariest of all rock films: Performance. Mick stars as a demonic reclusive rock star named Turner, hiding out in his London mansion in a decadent menage a trois with Anita Pallenberg and Michele Breton. As he warns, “The only performance that makes it, that really makes it, that makes it all the way, is the one that achieves madness.” The tension explodes when Mick howls this blues curse, “Memo from Turner,” with blues guitar from Ry Cooder. The song ended up in an equally druggy movie years later — it’s part of Ray Liotta’s coke-sweat freakout at the end of Goodfellas.

Mick is such a symbol of Western decadence, he creates an international crisis without even trying. In August 1983, at the peak of Cold War paranoia, a 16-year-old Russian kid — the son of a Soviet diplomat — tries to defect to the U.S. because he wants to be like the Stones. It doesn’t work, but as he’s boarding the plane back to Moscow, his parting words to reporters: “Say hi to Mick Jagger.”

Mick redefines pants in ‘Rock and Roll Circus’ A fashion peak for Mick, which for him means it’s also a philosophical peak. He’s the ringmaster of the Stones’ lavish concert movie Rock and Roll Circus. Sadly, the film gets buried, because they get cold feet when they see how great the Who are that night. But Mick has never made a prettier peacock, rocking his purple trousers off as he sings “You Can’t Always Get What You Want.” In his skintight red shirt and leather belt, he’s the queen of the underground.

Mick redefines the collapse of civilization in ‘Jigsaw Puzzle’. The Stones take a huge leap forward with Beggars Banquet — the album where they finally shake off the Beatles influence and blow up the blues. “Jigsaw Puzzle” is his wildly comic ramble through modern culture, a spoiled rock & roll prince watching the castles crumbling. Mick crows, “The singer, he looks angry at being thrown to the lions!” He also notes that the guitarists look damaged, the drummer looks shattered, and the bassist looks “nervous about the girls outside,” which is probably true.

Mick proves how easy it is to write faux-‘Exile’ songs with ‘Plundered My Soul’ For the 50th Anniversary edition of Exile on Main Street, Mick refurbishes some outtakes into finished songs, whipping up new lyrics. All he needs to do is go into his old Exile character, and out comes the brilliance of “Plundered My Soul.” It kinda raises the question of why he doesn’t do this more often? Jagger pulls the same trick for the Some Girls reissue, adding a whole new coat of NYC grime to “Do You Think I Really Care?”

Angie is exactly the kind of song you’d sing if you wanted to sound heartbroken about a woman, but you had no idea what it was like to give a shit. He sounds like he keeps saying her name because he’s having trouble remembering it. (“Angie, Aaa-haaan-jaaay—it is Angie, right?”) Keith started writing this song while recovering from heroin detox, for the album Goats Head Soup, but Mick turns it into his own kind of melodrama.

'Sweet Thing' is considered to be Mick's best solo effort, but the fantastic deep 'Empty Heart' from 1964, cut from the early days — the hungry young Stones at their meanest, out to conquer the world with this raw, primitive electric screamer of a song. Mick yowls about how it feels to have an empty heart, and why that’s a good thing.

In 1978 Mick caused an internationL scandal, making the headlines for reportedly dallying with Margaret Trudeau — whose husband at the time just happens to be the prime minister of Canada. (As is her son Justin in 2023.) The first lady skips their wedding anniversary to party with the Stones, in the same Toronto hotel where Keith just got busted for dope. Even Charlie Watts admits, “I wouldn’t want my wife associating with us.” Mick is shocked, shocked, at the sex rumors, dismissing them as “insulting to me and insulting to her.”

Monty Python’s Eric Idle and Neil Innes devised the fabbest and funniest of Beatles spoofs: The Rutles. In their TV mock-rockumentary All You Need Is Cash, they chronicle the Pre-Fab Four — “a music legend that will last a lunchtime.” But Mick steals the show as himself, totally deadpan, as he discusses the Rutles’ breakup, warning, “Cherchez la femme.” Mick gets the final word in the movie. Interviewer: “Do you think they’ll ever get back together?” Jagger: “I ‘ope not.”

Mick peacocks across Top 40 radio with the sleepwalk sex swagger of “Honky Tonk Women,” where the poor boy sounds exhausted by his busy bed-hopping schedule. He leers over the guitars and cowbell, as if if he’s slipping into a post-coital coma, chewing up the punchline: “She blew my nose and then she blew my mind.” It hits Number One for four weeks — the Stones’ biggest U.S. single.

Mick is such a symbol of Western decadence, he creates an international crisis without even trying. In August 1983, at the peak of Cold War paranoia, a 16-year-old Russian kid — the son of a Soviet diplomat — tries to defect to the U.S. because he wants to be like the Stones. It doesn’t work, but as he’s boarding the plane back to Moscow, his parting words to reporters: “Say hi to Mick Jagger.”

Mick dances on the 60's grave with 'Dead Flowers' poison valentine for the Woodstock generation? A surly lament for Altamont? A hardass portrait of smiling young potheads turning into zombie-eyed junkies? A countrified obituary for the not-even-dead-yet Gram Parsons? “Dead Flowers” is all that and more.

I’d like to point out one of Mick Jagger’s greatest and most overlooked quirks: his penchant for using ludicrous accents. It’s the oft unmentioned, oft forgotten tool with which Mick pushed music forward, whilst reaching back into its past, shining a mirror to its faults and moving forward.

So, it was quite common for him to don an exaggerated American, more specifically Southern-American accent, while singing various folk or country influenced songs. Quite possibly the best example of this is on the Stone’s 1978 album, “Some Girls,” in which Mick does THE WORST caricature of a country-western singer I have ever heard in “Far Away Eyes.” Mick even does some redneck spoken word “poetry” at various points in the song. It’s immediately funny, but it’s also a subtle satire of the genre, as Mick sings about religion and perfectly parodies the weird, exploitative nature of early rock music and the African American community. As most musicians, such as Jerry Lee Lewis and Elvis built their careers off of stealing from early African American performers.

One of his most explicable, and maybe least intentional accents was that of the strange quasi-German/Austrian accent that he uses in the spoken word section at the end of their 1980 song, “Emotional Rescue.” Nothing is written on this accent. Seriously, I’ve looked multiple times over the years and come up with no reasonable explanation, nor any explanation at all as to why he used that accent. Like, seriously, it’s almost as if nobody’s noticed that the lead singer of one of the world’s biggest rock bands suddenly started musing about being a “knight in shining armor” while LITERALLY sounding like “Funky Dracula.”

Though, he wrote songs for the common folk, quite literally ending an album with a song entitled “Salt of the Earth” in which he literally sang a ballad for the working class. Mick also used, according to a Hazlitt article by Linda Besner, a fake cockney accent, making him sound, more working class than he actually was. According to the article, several famous British people have used this “mockney accent” as a way to fit in with the populace. As Besner writes, “usually doing it to express some kind of solidarity between themselves and a historically underprivileged sector of society,” it was a way for The Stones to inject into the culture their messages, many of which lampooned the status quo and helped to bring about the revolutionary nature of the ‘60s.

In the flesh Jagger looked smaller and less impressive, so he had to work any room he enteted. Which is to say he had to flit around ceaselessly, wave his hands expressively a lot, wiggle his bum a bit, chat with certain people while pointedly ignoring others. He was constantly on the move, his body language like that of an over indulgend eleven year old allowed to stay up late and show off at his parents dinner party. He had this other peculiar habit of adopting the dialect and accent of anyone he was talking to, just as he was talking to them. One one occasion he was in a room with a white guy from the American South, a black guy from LA and a man from the North of England; and everyone stood quietly aghast as Micks voice weaved a reckless path away from his usual Cockney intonations to attempt a 'y'all' drenched drawl straight out of a particularly arch Tennessee Williams productions before slipping into a 'soul brother' black speak somewhat in the over excited cadence of Little Richard. When he finally started talking like a Manchester bus driver, everyone in the room looked utterly mystified because the whole performance was frankly ridiculous to begin with and you couldnt tell if Jagger consciously realized he was even doing it or not. But ultimately it didnt matter cose it got him what he wanted, which was to be the centre of attention.

The only force to which he was in thrall was the requirement to be a rock star. "I was a victim of cool, of the tyranny of hip," Jagger said. It made him abandon "kind, thoughtful, generous and chivalrous" impulsesand behave like a cad. After fathering a baby with Marsha Hunt, he responded to her request for a trust fund by making it a condition that she sign a document saying he wasn't the father. It's a shocking story of how rock divinity can't co-exist with human decency. Jagger has always had a fascination with money. He emphasises his intellectual interest in the stuff. Andrew Loog Oldham's accountant's father-in-law was startled to be asked by the 20-year-old Mick what he thought the pound would be worth on the currency market in a few years' time. Jagger comes across as a cautious, diffident, old-fashioned Englishman with "an insatiable thirst for social status". Leaving a trail of broken hearts and suicide bids in his wake, he body-swerved trouble and forgot calamities. While band mates smoked, snorted, shot up and swallowed every drug available, Jagger practised moderation. "Even LSD gave up in despair after finding no inner demons". He reveals that a favourite Jagger seduction line (usually employed in the back of a limo) was "Do you like waking up in the country or the city?"

But fittingly, as one who stole his vocal and his dancing style from others, this most tricky of shadow puppets seems insubstantial compared to the women in his life, whether it is Faithfull making him read books, Bianca making him talk French (she comes out of it as a nasty piece of work, pleasingly, her insistence on complete servility from the Stones's employees making a neat counterpoint to her failed reinvention as champion of the wretched of the earth) or Jerry Hall making him look like a Lothario in later life when he inexplicably manages to bag her from the far more desirable Bryan Ferry. 

Stinginess is the halitosis of the soul, and MJ reeked of it. His most frequent query whenever a tour is coming up is the peevish "Are we paying for that?" Sure, he had his 60s flirtations with Tom Driberg and Angela Davis but he was off to the south of France like a shot in the 70s when the chance to avoid paying tax raised its ugly head.































Sunday, 9 June 2024

Joy Division's Most Manic Gig - Ajanta Cinema, Derby (April 19th, 1980)



As Joy Division started the hypnotic bass riff to the legendary She's Lost Control they had no idea that it would be the last time they would be performing the song live. On the night of April 19th, 1980 in the dystopian city of Derby at the remote derelict Ajanta Cinema (also known as the Derby Playhouse) just outside of city centre, which screened adult movies, and had a run down, seedy atmosphere - which made it ideal for holding punk gigs. Underground filmmaker Fabrizio Federico now talks to the fans who were there that special night. At the Ajanta Cinema bands such as ATV, Stiff Little Fingers, The Lurkers, Manicured Noise, The Pop Group, The Slits, The Mekons had already played there but Joy Division were the biggest name band to enter its doors that Saturday.
The cinema still has most of its tatty seats fixed firmly in their rows, but some at the front had been removed to allow dancing.

Opening the gig were XL5, a local band from Derby who sounded like a 1977 thrashy punk style, which went down ok but they never got asked back to play an encore. Section 25 came on next. The three-piece band, who used modern electronic instruments, plus drums and guitars, sounded in the same school as The Pop Group, The Human League and Scritti Politti with their cutting edgy way. Titles like "Cambodia" set the mood for the evening in its apocalyptical fashion, incorporating jungle drumming and flickering, machine-gun bursts of wailing guitars as a background to the monotone vocals.

Joy Division came on stage to resounding applause, and kicked off with "Dead Souls". The magnificent, deep voice of Ian Curtis, deadpan and ultimately spine-chilling, contrasted sharply with his manic dancing during instrumental interludes. The bass guitar quietly set the beat, the drummer varied it, and the lead guitarist viciously attacked it in a way that seemed the songs would destroy themselves before they finished. The set progressed, and I mean progressed, and peaked with their rendition of "Transmission", their bitter attack upon the stagnation of live radio, in which Curtis repeatedly urges the listener to "Dance, dance, dance, dance, dance to the radio"; and "She's Lost Control", a track from their album "Unknown Pleasures" which on this night included an oddball keyboard solo performed by Ian. The frontman possessed by a menacing mentality, with a focused intensity, a flayed pale torso, a grey charity-shop shirt, alluding to a world beyond the material, facing down the birthday of eternity, staring through and over and around the lingering members of the crowd, beyond himself, pushing himself somewhere forever into the future. 

Because of Ian's unhinged performance this night on the bootleg you can hear an audience member say ''Who's that spaz?" They came back for two encores, but it wasn't enough. There were so many songs, like "24 Hours", or the future single, "Love Will Tear Us Apart" (a masterpiece indeed), which they didn't play, that the audience was left unsatisfied, still tense and expectant. Perhaps this is what the group wanted to achieve, a desire to see the band again. Joy Division are a reminder that the eighties had now arrived. There was a sense of relief among the band knowing that this would be one of their last gigs for a bit, so that they could get some rest. It would also be the penultimate time Ian would see his mistress Annik, which coincidentally also occured on Joy Division's penultimate gig that they would ever play.

By all accounts Ian Cutis' dancing in Derby was the most memorable and maniacle of any other gig Joy Division ever played. On previous occasions he was fairly lively and eye-catching, but this time he was almost scary. His dance moves were similar to autistic and the mentally-handicapped movements, very edgy and puppet like with a violent edge. Some of the audience were amused and maybe even a little embarrassed. Ian was the only member of the band in a spotlight (white), the rest of the band in almost total darkness. 


Wearing a brown dress shirt open showing a
white vest, Ian stormed though the set in his crazed twitching persona that audience members still remember to this day for its intensity. Here are the audience member recollections. 

Darrell Buxton: It was 44 years ago and I was only 17. But I remember it being amazing. It was Joy Division's last gig on their last-ever tour (they only played one more show after this, a few weeks later in Birmingham as a warm-up for a planned US tour that obviously never went ahead...) Section 25 supported and were excellent. Ian took his time coming out on stage, the band played the intro to 'Dead Souls' for what seemed like an agonisingly long wait before the vocalist stepped into the spotlight. Despite his troubles, which probably led to the long delay that night, he was immediately commanding and magnetic, a real presence. There were probably about 150 people there (the venue had a short but glittering history and I think the same few dozen people turned up to most gigs - I saw Magazine, Bauhaus, Psychedelic Furs, Soft Boys, Monochrome Set, Killing Joke, Au Pairs, and other bands there). I wasn't a seasoned gig-goer at that time, and my brother aged just 15 was with me too, but early shows like this one really cemented our love of live music. Crass had played there a few days earlier (I didn't see them but my brother did) and I remember a local punk saying "not as good as Crass!" as everyone left the venue and stepped out into the cold night. The gig recreations in Michael Winterbottom's film 24 Hour Party People are pretty accurate, if that's any guideline. Ian did his trademark jerky dancing and intense forward stare throughout the whole gig, or much of it. The support band Section 25, who were excellent, came back on stage during the encores and I think Ian may have lightened up a little then, but I really can't recall. It's probably more likely that he sat it out backstage while Barney, Peter and Steven played with the other band.


Rob Hodgkinson: I remember that they played a lot of material from ‘closer’, which ( I may be wrong!) hadn’t been released …..it was much more energetic live than on the album, which is often the case with bands live compared to in the studio.  The show was recorded, and I know that Rees Lewis, which was in both Medium Medium and CCat Trance, had the tape many years ago, but he seems to have dropped off the radar in recent years unfortunately. It was a superb gig…..there was a tension and energy that you could cut with a knife coming from the band, and Ian in particular.

David Symonds: I remember that the Ajanta used to show Bollywood movies and occasionally one would appear behind the band during the set. There wasn’t any sense that it would be their second to last gig . Joy Division projected quite a foreboding image anyway so there were rarely any smiles or laughs. I can’t remember too much about the performance - I think they did an encore with Section 25 but honestly we might have left by then as we had to get the last bus to Nottingham. I remember being impressed by Section 25 spending their whole performance with their back to the audience. But overall Ian was mesmerising. Actually so was Stephen the drummer who was the real workhorse of the band. At the time only those of us who were into ‘alternative’ music had come through punk and hated the idea of rock ‘legends’ of any sort. It’s easy to forget that while the music press loved them, they were still playing only 2-300 seat venues (such as the Adjanta). Onstage they were quite a strange combination. I think we were quite close but I can’t remember. As for the sound - it was loud but Ian vocals were quite buried - I saw JD twice neither time was the sound particularly good. Their live sound was quite patchy with drums often dominating. Bernie concentrated so hard on playing  that he was virtually motionless most of the time. Hooky appeared to playing in an entirely different band and Ian’s  voice , to be honest, needed more control. His seizure-inspired dancing was in equal parts comical and disturbing. But there was something about them. They were more than the sum of their parts.

Stephen Fletcher: It was 40 years ago to the day, me Daz, Chris and Kerry went to what would be the penultimate Joy Division gig. This isn't my ticket stub or poster, I found these on another site. I can't even remember whether we bought tickets or paid on the door. I remember queing outside to get in and there was derelict wasteland opposite the venue, which was rough. Daggy Mills (RIP) was also there. It was dark and dingy inside which was quite apt for a JD gig. It was the first time I'd seen them play a headline gig, having seen them previously support John Cooper Clarke and Buzzcocks. 
I'd guess there were probably about 80 people there tops. Forget social media exposure: anyone there had probably already seen them and knew how good they were or they'd caught the word of mouth buzz about them. 
There was no merchandise for this T-shirt wanker to buy, as per Rob Gretton's management policy! Great days and a bootleg CD to remember it by.

Adi Murfin: It was a very full house that night. I was only 14 and went along for something to on a Saturday night ..I'd heard Unknown Pleasures my brother had it and played it on repeat. I remember coming away from the gig very impressed with what I'd seen and heard. It was the 2nd to last gig Joy Division ever did ..so hearing Ian had committed suicide shortly after really kind of phased me, it mad me very sad and confused. The atmosphere was very good that night, and the sound was brilliant. I remember standing at the back so I didn't get down to near the stage, I was kind of transfixed on his dancing I'd never seen anything like it, his dancing was manic. The audience was a mixed bag of punks, alternatives and ordinary people. 

Martin Rockley: I can remember it was very dark, very loud, and very earnest. Lots of serious young men in long coats and suits grabbed from charity shops. The vibe to me seemed to be either absolute devotion, or curious cynicism. They didn't play for that long, but they were so good. A lot tighter and more powerful than I thought they'd be. My favourite was 'Dead Souls' which I think they started with. The Ajanta was great because it was a scruffy old cinema, owned by a really friendly Asian family, and they only put on pretty obscure indie bands - at least for the times. I'd already seen them at The Assembly Rooms in Derby (supporting Buzzcocks) so I knew what to expect. His dancing was quite startling, like part of him was having a fit, or he needed to get something out of himself. His aura did seem a little sad. He was a captivating frontman because it felt you were watching something private and dangerous, rather than him putting on a 'show'. They do a jam at the end with the support band though. Thas was a bit un-Joy Division like I thought. 

Mark Etchells: It seems as long ago as it was. However, I remember it being one of those moments when watching live music when the hair stands up on the back of your neck, testament to witnessing something special. I saw alot of bands back then, and that feeling didn't happen very often.
Curtis was enigmatic, his lost persona reaching a new level of gauntness coupled with his now famous dance moves during Transmission, and She's Lost Control's lyrics to the latter exploding forth with spit and sweat through the arc of the stage front lights. A memory that has stayed with me since, burnt into my mind.
There's a live bootleg from this gig online, sure you've probably heard it. Quality isn't good obviously but I still listen to it now. A few tickets I saved from back in the days of cheap gigs and great choice. Small venues often never gave tickets so there's many missing, lost in sweat and late night bus journeys. The gig was pretty uneventful unlike a few more Ajanta gigs, the first four rows of seats were removed I think at an early SLF gig. But no strange events at this one. Ajanta gigs were always pretty special as it was so small, you were really on top of each other. Saw Bauhaus there too and Throbbing Gristle, so many bands, The Fall. Between me and my brother we had the singles and the albums that were out, we used to catch the bus in and out of Derby leaving some gigs early to get the last bus, sometimes school in the morning. A pretty cool English teacher would often ask me what I thought of the gigs, he'd be there too but never let on. And yes my brother was there too. The vibe of the crowd was good, proper fans even that early on. We were all in shock, somehow aware that we had witnessed something special for sure, no inkling that Curtis would end it all so quickly. Thinking back to She's Lost Control it was certainly a performance on the edge of madness and pain. 

Songs performed:
01. Dead Souls
02. Wilderness
03. Digital
04. Insight
05. Passover
06. Heart And Soul
07. Isolation
08. These Days
09. Transmission
10. She's Lost Control
11. Colony
12. Girls Don't Count/jam with SECTION 25




















Wednesday, 10 April 2024

Captain Beefheart - The Cult & Manipulation of Trout Mask Replica

 

The legend of Captain Beefheart is one of music's most looney tunes tales, of an unbalanced maverick who ran a cult-like regime on his bandmates through out most of his career in the Magic Band. But in 1969 it reached its apex. Not allowing bandmembers to leave the house they were practicing in, only allowing one member to leave once a week to pick-up food supplies. No sleep, lack of food and the constant practicing of the Trout Mask Replica songs slowly drove them insane. In preparation, the band rehearsed Van Vliet's difficult compositions for eight months, isolated living communally in a small rented house in Woodland Hills, Los Angeles.  Later recorded between August 1968 – March 1969 and released in June 1969. Don had persuaded them that chicks and sex would interfere with their music, and so they played day and night, day and night. Unfortunately there was no money either and they starved, came down with illnesses, and were found wandering in search of food – one of them in a woman's dress, boots and a helmet, a crazed look in his eyes. Eventually they all left, some to return, but most to find food and recuperate and maybe even find a job with a band that made just a little money.

According to John French and Bill Harkleroad, these sessions often included physical violence. French described the situation as "cultlike", and a visiting friend said that "the environment in that house was positively Manson-esque". Their material circumstances also were dire. With no income other than welfare and contributions from relatives, the band survived on a bare subsistence diet. French recounted living on no more than a small cup of soybeans a day for a month, and at one point, band members were arrested for shoplifting food (whereupon Zappa bailed them out). A visitor described their appearance as "cadaverous" and said that "they all looked in poor health". Band members were restricted from leaving the house and practiced for fourteen or more hours a day. Van Vliet once told drummer John French that he had been diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, and he would see nonexistent conspiracies that explained this behavior. There was also punishment dished out to the band members. To explain The Barrel, we shall lean on a vignette put forth by John French, otherwise known as Drumbo, no prizes for guessing what he played. When he was drafted in, he recalled making a mistake one session and having Vliet fly off the proverbial handle. Vliet commanded Drumbo to “get in the barrel”. Unwittingly he climbed into the old beer cask at the behest of the Captain. Therein, Vliet repeatedly struck the barrel with a stick and berated Drumbo’s performance with a fury akin to the Devil’s father on the sidelines of a football game. Don would even make the band sit around late at night  and listen to his girlfriend read Salvador Dali - Diary Of A Genius (1963) & The Naked Ape by Desmond Morris (1967). They would go to bed at 1am and then wake up at 10am and start all over. The band slept on the floor in sleeping bags, except for Don and his girl, who had the master bedroom. Don would get up around 12pm-1pm then go to the piano and work on songs.

Undoubtedly, Don Van Vliet was a larger-than-life individual, both irrational, tyranical and manipulative, someone for whom mythic status seemed not so much appropriate as inevitable. Thompson boasts that “his life resists all attempts at demystification” (99). This kind of hyperbole amounts to a virtual matter of reflex when the subject was said to have gone for a year and a half without sleep; possessed three-and-a-half inch ears; was able to know phones would ring before the signal sounded; once sold a vacuum cleaner to Aldous Huxley; and submitted a bill to his record label for the damage to a studio's surrounding oaks and cedars because he believed the recording process in which he and the Magic Band had participated upset their equilibrium (99). Inspiration wise the Captain was listening to a lot of Ornette Coleman, Karlheinz Stockhausen, Harry Partch, Albert Ayler and the new wave of tape composers such as Pauline Oliveros, Terry Riley and Steve Reich, who's song Come Out would be on constant rotation all night while they smoked pot and rolled their eyeballs in circles.

When commenting on Captain Beefheart, writers seem to have found themselves in a situation regarding Beefheart comparable to that of the reporter, played by Edmund O'Brien, in John Ford's The Man Who Shot Liberty Valence (1962) who asserts at the conclusion, “When the legend becomes fact, print the legend.” The true story of Trout Mask was astonishing enough, but although near-starvation had long been associated with artistic endeavour, fist fights, tyranny and “brainwashing” sessions weren't such attractive selling points to the Woodstock generation. All that was kept under wraps and over time Van Vliet has been instead quoted, or paraphrased, as saying that the Magic Band worked by telepathy; or that [Mark] Boston had only been playing bass for six months, and [Bill] Harkleroad the guitar for seven months on joining, or that he had written all the music in eight and a half hours at the piano with variously named [John] French or [Victor] Hayden frantically transcribing his fevered outpourings; or that they regularly rehearsed for twenty hours a day; or that he had not left the Ensenada Drive house for over three years. Outside the claustrophobic mental assault course of life at the house, Van Vliet was generous in his praise of the musicians. But he was also unequivocal in taking credit for both writing and arranging all the music. And the myth was certainly helped by his portrayal of the musicians as idiot savant types who had never played before and whom he had taught from scratch. But in effect he did teach them from scratch. Certainly none of them would have come up with anything like Trout Mask Replica on their own. When he was over in London on press duties with Zappa, Van Vliet was asked by Zig Zag if the group were involved in music before the Magic Band. He made the point: “They were always involved, but now they're playing.” And later to Elliott Wald from Oui he said: “The musicians worked so hard at it. They were born on that Album.” (Barnes Citation119–20).

Chronologically, guitarist Harkleroad broke ranks first when in 1998 he published his pained recollections of participation in the band between 1968 and 1974: Lunar Notes: Zoot Horn Rollo's Captain Beefheart Experience. Raised in the desert communities of California where Van Vliet matured, the guitarist initially interacted with the composer as a teenager during jam sessions and was previously acquainted as well with Magic Band members French and guitarist Jeff Cotton. He joined them soon after completing high school. 

Almost immediately, Harkleroad perceived something disconcerting about the environment, as his friends seemed simultaneously uncomfortable and excessively animated: “John and Jeff were not the same guys I used to know. They both had a seriously dire look in their eyes, yet on occasions would slip into a seriously over-the-top excitement” (23). The dissonant dimension of the experience diffused, however, in the face of the rewarding complexity of Van Vliet's compositions. He recalls, “That was really one of the best parts of being in the band. It legitimized art as opposed to that whole attitude of, ‘You're supposed to go to the post office and work and have three kids’” (26). Quickly, however, the admiration and animation Harkleroad experienced was transformed into disdain and disorientation. “The whole vibe consisted of us being enlightened by our overseer,” he remarks, once he recognized the degree to which he had become a “slavedog,”’ practicing sometimes sixteen or seventeen hours a day (38, 39). In addition, when the band was not practicing, they were subjected to belligerent indoctrination sessions led by Van Vliet that felt like little more than brainwashing. 

Their wills broken down by lack of sleep, little food and long bouts of strenuous performance, these young men not long out of high school were compelled by Van Vliet to think of one another as potential deviants from the cause, as their overseer divided his ensemble into initiates and apostates. With Don there was always a “culprit,” there always had to be a person for him to vent his “beef” of the moment onto. Don was always picking on whoever he deemed to be the “bad person” of that particular moment. This always rotated, all of us were in that position at one time or another.…As a result of picking on people, it was not at all uncommon for us to literally go around beating the shit out of each other! (Harkleroad Citation68) One time in private with John French, Don asked him what he thought of another band memeber, after John told him he didnt think he was very good, Dom later brought it up in front of the whole band what John had said behind his back. Divide and conquer at its finest. 

Harkleroad does not dwell upon these abuses, although he does characterize himself as a “beaten little puppy” who rationalizes his continuation in the ensemble because of the challenges of the repertoire and the skills to be learned as Van Vliet's musical amanuensis (85). He transcribed the separate shards that the bandleader created, assimilated them into coherent compositions and taught them by ear to his associates. After six years, however, Harkleroad could no longer tolerate this treatment and quit. He puts in perspective the length of his endurance with the conviction that Van Vliet was a truly great and abusive person in equal parts. As for worldly rewards, he received no money for his labors and admits to underplaying the depth of his degradation: “To this day I don't think I've ever really represented the situation as bad as it really was. I've just told parts of it” (130–31).

If Harkleroad minimizes his pain, John French maximizes the psychological and professional baggage incurred by placing himself in a subordinate position to a frequently belligerent taskmaster. What Harkleroad withholds, French unveils. Beefheart: Through the Eyes of Magic possesses a kind of Tolstoyan amplitude. A hefty 800 plus pages, it interweaves the drummer's exhaustive recollections along with information drawn from interviews with various members of the Magic Band as well as other associates and acquaintances from Van Vliet's past. The resemblance of French to the Russian novelist as an interrogator of behavior, however, does not stop at a simple matter of page length. He exhibits a comparable eagerness to comprehend convoluted human acts equal to that which impelled Tolstoy to inquire what drives societies to engage in battle or distinguishes one unhappy family from another. French concludes Van Vliet's erratic actions, their obscure motivations and the damage that arose in their wake to be as ultimately incomprehensible as the bulk of the public find the composer's repertoire. At the same time, the substantive difference between that audience and the drummer comes down to the simple fact that most people avoid repeated encounters with the Beefheart catalogue whereas French returns with a dogged persistence not only to perform with the composer but also to attempt to suss out what makes him tick. He has committed his lifetime both to that repertoire as well as to the dissection of the personality of its creator.

Beefheart: Through the Eyes of Magic opens with the explosive impact of a close-up in a Sam Fuller feature film, such as the object struck into the camera lens that begins The Naked Kiss (1964): John French is jammed into a wall by his bandmates as Van Vliet angrily interrogates him in the process of “another of his ridiculous witch hunts” (7). He continues, ''A day like this seemed to happen after about five normal days. In fact, most of the days like this lasted two days, occasionally even three. They were comprised of the sleepless horror of either being the target or watching the target and knowing you soon would be next. Huge amounts of tea were consumed to keep us awake and alert.'' (CitationFrench, Beefheart 7) 

The paradox at the core of this scenario that French will unpack with the skill of a therapist and the dedication of a fictional shamus comes down to how encounters such as these, whose goal “seemed to be to completely strip the individual in question of all dignity, self-worth and pride,” could coincide with an artistic agenda that would result in “a quest to finish an album that would later land the position of 33rd in the top albums ever recorded—at least according to Rolling Stone magazine” (8, 9). French concludes by assessing that, notwithstanding the harassment, the poverty, the physical wear and tear, “I knew it was a privilege—albeit certainly wrapped in an ironic cloak—to be associated with this man” (768). And yet, so varied and unpredictable could Van Vliet be that, out of the blue, he might act in a manner that puts the kibosh on any conclusive judgment of his character. In that regard, the last, altogether typically gnomic things that Van Vliet said to French hold considerable resonance: “You were always there, man,” repeated three times with his hand on his heart, and then the ultimate admonition, “I'll see you around. Watch your topknot, and keep your eyes on the skyline” (French, Beefheart 748, ”Watch Your Topknot” 35).

Exhaustive as French's detailing of his experience with Van Vliet may be, it is possible to subdivide the acrimony into categories. Otherwise, a reader can become as swamped by the evidence as French often feels overwhelmed by his emotions and memories. Two bodies of information particularly stand out: first, the refusal on the bandleader's part either to practice standardized musical language or to alleviate his ignorance in any manner. This led to his dependence upon French, and others including Harkleroad, to translate his ideas and transfer them to their confederates. If one were to put the matter in an automotive context, Van Vliet adamantly demanded to occupy the driver's seat but steadfastly refused to earn a license. Second, there was the manner in which Van Vliet maltreated his accompanists psychologically and eventually physically in a seemingly systematic effort to evacuate them of any sense of self-worth, even of personality. Part of the rationale for both the length of the book and the scope of the evidence is to permit French not only to validate his reading of Van Vliet but also to reinforce its accuracy by means of the corroboration offered to him by others who were treated in the same manner and suffered the same indignity. 

He states, “Don's strongest talent may lay not in his musical abilities as most would think, but in his theatrical abilities, which he had developed at an early age….Van Vliet's theatrical abilities were able to convince others that he was a genuine blues singer, when, in fact, he was merely playing a composite role of the heroes of his adolescence.…Don was often lost in his own songs” (Beefheart 125). Putting the time into practicing or endeavouring to learn his own material with sufficient precision such that he could repeat it from one occasion to another—an ability he routinely demanded of his accompanists—apparently failed to stimulate Van Vliet's imagination. Part of the impetus behind his ill treatment of his accompanists consequently arose from his deliberate lack of a common language that he could share with them. Whenever he could not translate his ideas into a communal form, Van Vliet would turn upon the others and attack their very professional competence rather than recognize the liability of his own failure to acquire certain elementary musical skills. His commitment to his music remained, start to finish, resolutely self-referential; adamantly committed to the assumption that other performers were vehicles for his work, not individuals to be valued for themselves.

This posture can perhaps be most accurately illustrated by Van Vliet's habit of explaining how he wanted his accompanists to perform in a manner that refused to be anything other than metaphorical. Biographer Mike Barnes sympathetically explains the process as follows: “Van Vliet was becoming more interested in using found sounds to generate musical ideas and his descriptions of what he wanted were beginning to sound like a verbalized equivalent of a section of graphic score” (303). For example, the drummer Cliff Martinez reports receiving the following sets of instructions from Van Vliet: “Make it like Fred Astaire dangling through a tea cup; like BBs on the plate; babies flying over the mountains” (Barnes 303). 

Even if the composer believed his intention was to disrupt the conventional patterns of communication, French and others speculate whether, in fact, the practice was yet another means of controlling the situation without having to step outside a rigidly defined comfort zone. John French's description of what it was like to be Van Vliet's musical amanuensis reinforces this tactic of simultaneously controlling others while abnegating the role of authority: “Putting together Don's music was like taking a dozen jigsaw puzzles and dumping them into the same box, then dividing the scrambled parts and putting several puzzles together at once. Everything was incomplete and disorganized. It made the whole effort seem intensely overwhelming” (292). It would be a mistake to assume that Van Vliet routinely acted in such a passive manner, for he repeatedly exercised his authority with considerable vigor at least and overt violence at worst. French and Harkleroad each report on how he often deliberately adopted the role of despot. Even when an ostensible rationale for his behavior could not be discerned, Van Vliet did not seem to require a distinct impetus in order to launch into aggression. French nonetheless uncovers a method, or perhaps a formula, to his belligerence. ''It was a bit of Pavlov, mixed with Synanon, interrogation procedures, sleep deprivation, and brainwashing techniques all rolled up in a bundle. It was actually brilliant work on Don's part. I think his most brilliant work ever—his total control and manipulation of four young men. This was group encounter in which negative reinforcement techniques transformed us into obedient minions.'' (French, Beefheart 375)

Sometimes these techniques led to a one-on-one attack upon a particular musician, usually in the form of character assassination. The most indistinguishable factors set off Van Vliet. So indelible was the impact of his behavior that, years later, members of the Magic Band could still flinch at simply hearing a phrase that he would use to dismiss them. Harkleroad writes:

Recently I got together with Citation John French, he was here visiting and my wife and I took him out to dinner, and he said a phrase I hadn't heard for years, it almost made me quiver. He said “You have a thing”. And when you “had a thing” you were the culprit. The dirty thing you had done, whatever it was, was undermining the brilliance of our situation. So we all “had things”, of course. Except one person—and you can guess who that was (43). 

On other occasions, as in the episode that opens French's narrative, Van Vliet enlisted the rest of the Magic Band as accomplices and dealt out physical punishment to the individual who had been labeled an apostate. In the body of his memoir, French provides an even more detailed and disturbing description of the attack upon him. ''Don shouted, “Get him!” On that verbal cue, all four of them started hitting me at once, mostly in the face. I can only recall this kind of physical attack happening to me and only this once, but it was absolutely terrifying.…I had been scared, but this time I actually thought I was going to die, and this was more real than anything before. I remember being cornered in the kitchen and hand after hand hitting and slapping me on the face and upper body and being kicked.…This was the most frightened I had ever been and I shouted “stop” several times.'' (French, Beefheart 451)

What proved to be equally if not even more disconcerting to French than the physical pain inflicted upon him was how Van Vliet switched positions almost immediately. The very next evening, he was appointed “Don's ‘special friend’ again,” urged not to leave, and informed he was crucial to the maintenance of the Magic Band (455). Nothing about Van Vliet's behavior on this latter occasion came across as premeditated or purposefully sanctimonious. To French, “This was a very emotional and heartfelt moment, and I almost never saw Don appear this sincere in my whole experience with him” (455). At the same time, the variability of Van Vliet's behavior does not contradict his primary aim of being in control at all times. French hypothesizes how the fact that he was an only child instilled in Van Vliet an innate and inflexible sense of superiority. Van Vliet reinforced this supposition when he forthrightly informed the drummer, “You realize, John, that I am a King.…John, you know I am” (507). Van Vliet was also not above being simply and purely petty and vindictive. For all that French did to actualize the very material contained on Trout Mask Replica, he was denied any credit on the jacket sleeve of the album. Admittedly, his image appears among the other oddly dressed individuals in the incorporated photos, yet the list of performers would lead one to assume that the drumming was performed by a phantom.

When the master does not allow his or her individuality and distinctiveness to swallow up this environment, the passing along of tacit knowledge can dominate, facilitating growth on the part of his or her subordinates, and a supportive community comes into existence.

Sociologist Richard Sennett presents a vision of how a workshop can most demonstrably permit this kind of growth in his book The Craftsman. He writes, ''In theory the well-run workshop should balance tacit and explicit knowledge. Masters should be pestered to explain themselves, to dredge out the assemblage of clues and moves they have absorbed into silence within—if only they could, or if only they would. Much of their very authority derives from seeing what others don't see, knowing what they don't know; their authority is made manifest in their silence.'' (Sennett 78)

Sennett believes that one of the primary acts that indicate how much masters are willing to subordinate their authority to the needs of the workshop is how they explain their skills, how they transmit their expertise. Even though an apprentice learns a great deal by osmosis, whenever the master demonstrates some skill, a burden exists on the part of the apprentice to be sure that they figure out, as Sennett states, “what turned the key in the lock,” so to speak (181). A genuine and potentially transformational transposition of knowledge is encouraged whenever the master recognizes the vulnerability of the apprentice, and “[t]his turn to vulnerability is the sign of sympathy the instructor gives” (186). He adds, “the expert guides by anticipating difficulties for the novice; sympathy and prehension combine” (186). Whenever masters, however, fail to consider beforehand how their skills come into being, that partial, and ultimately incomprehensible, explanation is defined by Sennett as “dead denotation” (183). This form of instruction becomes vivid only to someone who has accomplished the task beforehand. Over-familiarity on the part of the master can only increase the degree of dead denotation. Therefore, Sennett asserts, “The challenge posed by dead denotation is precisely to take apart tacit knowledge, which requires bringing to the surface of consciousness that knowledge which has become so self-evident and habitual that it seems just natural” (183). Appraising the degree to which this transmission succeeds necessitates a moral judgment upon the masters, as their willingness or failure to interpolate in their instructions the degree of vulnerability possessed by a novice indicates their capacity for extinguishing solipsism and inaugurating sympathy. Even if neither Harkleroad nor French appears to be aware of Sennett's study, their memoirs together reinforce how Van Vliet chose to embody the role of master in a particularly truncated and ultimately inefficient fashion. His level of sympathy appears to have been attenuated, and his willingness to take apart and render into public discourse his inner thoughts and forms of expression virtually negligible. Consequently, he may well have been frustrated to the extreme by finding himself in this position, and his objectifications of the Magic Band resulted to some degree from his sense that they as a group occupied a separate and lamentably incompatible universe. Van Vliet in the end abnegated his very exercise of authority as a master by failing to attempt to comprehend what these young men, just barely out of high school and only embarked upon manhood, knew and did not know. He chose by and large to manifest his authority through either silence, illustrated by his lack of practice time spent with his accompanists, or a form of expression so driven by private references as to be virtually inexplicable. Of course, as even Sennett admits, a workshop does not guarantee the acquisition of knowledge; sometimes it does not ever transmit the skills required for a particular activity. Nonetheless, how that process occurs is rich with ethical implications.

Perhaps, in the end, the assumption that Van Vliet could or even wished to exceed the least common requirements of the role of master flies in the face of the core of his personality. Clearly, neither Harkleroad nor French felt, despite considerable interaction with him personally and professionally, that they ever cracked the code of the core of his being. An insurmountable barrier of personal inhibitions and prohibitions intervened. Maybe they would have been forewarned more explicitly as to that obstacle had they read certain of Van Vliet's lyrics as an index of his character. As stated earlier, one of the core paradoxes of his accomplishments remains how a body of work that challenges fixation and celebrates open-mindedness should have incorporated such a profound degree of rigidity in order to come into existence. One cannot therefore soft-pedal the encomiums in his words to the vitality of physical nature or appreciate his employment of a broad range of the possible forms of the imagination without keeping in mind the occasions when his musicians were made to feel less than human. 

One way potentially to make sense of this conundrum is to recognize that there are those kinds of individuals who can bring more oxygen into a room than already exists in a space, allow those they share that territory with to breathe more fully and experience a beneficial giddiness. And there are others who suck much of the oxygen out of a given environment and leave their cohorts gasping for breath and disagreeably light-headed. Don Van Vliet seems to be both of those kinds of individuals, as he could inspire and incapacitate his associates at one and the same time.

So you would get the band living communally and being subjected by Beefheart to extreme social isolation, starvation and that most delightful of brainwashing techniques, scapegoating. This happens in many places - the leader (Beefheart in this case) picks out a group member (could be Jimmy Semens one week, Rockette Morton the next, John French the week after that) and blames him for screwing up some song or another, or generally bringing everyone down with his miserable vibe, or eating too much bread, or anything. Beefheart would then subject the individual to hours of verbal abuse, cranking up the menace and browbeating everyone else to join in, until the scapegoat was taking insults escalating to physical violence from all the others. Ribs were broken at times, fists were used. 

After a while it’s clear that the cultish atmosphere includes many features of what we now recognise as Grooming and Psychological Manipulation. Group members were cut off from friends and family. The Captain controls everything to do with money, living conditions, drugs and food as well as the music. As someone says very perceptively towards the end of the book: “Don van Vliet was fortunate to have lived in an era where his psychopathic behaviour could be misconstrued as genius” At least Manson had an income though, the austerity in Vliet’s HQ was verging on some sort of Soviet reverse opulence. The entire commune had zero income other than welfare for the duration of their stay and powered through 14-hour practice sessions every day fuelled by no more than a cup of soybeans that had usually been stolen on scavenger hunts. With extreme punishments for stepping out of line, the process moved forward tentatively. As Drumbo puts it, “It was as though someone had taken a blank jigsaw puzzle, randomly picked up pieces and scribbled little pictures on each one, and said, ‘Put this together, I’ll be out later to see the thing when it’s done’.”

Even when Vliet entered the studio for more professional phases, he recorded the overdubbed vocals by hearing the original songs through a slightly ajar window. Owing to the fact that he could barely hear the melody the vocals remain complete unsynchronised. When this was pointed out to him, he presumably left the studio like The Fonz twirling his keys on his fingers as he quipped, “[Synchronising?] That’s what they do before a commando raid, isn’t it?” The result is an album that remains beyond review. The mayhem bleeds through, but depending on who you ask, a few moments of magic can be found in the melee. All that is left to say, is that there is certainly nothing so strange as folk. 

The same can be said when the pieces were finally ready to be put together. One of the initial recordings involved Zappa coming to the house with engineer Dick Kunc and setting up the recording equipment in the centre of the house then achieving sound separation by having each musician play behind a closed door in a different room of the house. It’s this question that becomes a recurrent theme – how a scene that was initially based on the potentially liberating forces of psychedelics soon produced a kind of dystopia where it became “uncool” at the very least to challenge obnoxious behaviour. Drumbo gives numerous examples of how the group were intimidated by the Captain, and afraid to be the one to stand out. Equally, the media didn’t want to look uncool by not “getting it”. There’s a particularly fawning 1971 Rolling Stone interview where nonsense like “there are only forty people in the world, and five of them are hamburgers” go unchallenged.











Friday, 22 March 2024

Cult filmmaker Fabrizio Federico picks his Top 'Coming Of Age' Movies


  • Rivers edge (1986)
  • Desperate for love (1989)
  • Over the Edge (1979)
  • The Death of Richie (1977)
  • Twisted (1986)
  • The Boys Next Door (1985)
  • Heathers (1988)
  • Paolo Alto (2013)
  • The Legend Of Billie Jean (1985)
  • The Wonderers (1979)
  • Mean Girls (2004)
  • Rushmore (1998)
  • Bully (2001)
  • Shoplifters Of The World (2021)
  • Julien Donkey Boy (1999)
  • The Virgin Suicides (1999)
  • White Oleander (2002)
  • Jimmy & Judy (2006)
  • Quadrophenia (1979)
  • Boyz In The Hood (1991)
  • Ricky 6 (2000)
  • Menace To Society (1993)
  • Another Day In Paradise (1998)
  • Terror In The Family (1996)
  • Fear (1996)
  • Basketball Diaries (1995)
  • Out Of The Blue (1980)
  • My Own Private Idaho (1991)
  • Mala Noche (1985)
  • Child Of Rage (1992)
  • American Heart (1992)
  • Christine F (1981)
  • Chains Of Gold (1991)
  • Castle In The Ground (2019)
  • Zero Day (2003)
  • Elephant (2003)
  • We Need ToTalk About Kevin (2011)
  • Archie's Final Project (2009)
  • Dear Mr Gacy (2010)
  • The Last American Virgin (1982)
  • Flowers In The Attic (1987)
  • Theorem (1968)
  • Twisted Nerve (1968)
  • La Luna (1979)
  • The Devil Probably (1977)
  • Pixote (1980)
  • Poison For The Fairies (1986)
  • Murder By Numbers (2002)
  • The Crush (1993)
  • An American Crime (2007)
  • L.I.E (2001)
  • Hurricane Streets (1997)
  • The Ice Storm (1997)
  • Welcome To The Doll House (1995)
  • Ghost World (2001)
  • Mikey (1992)
  • Teenage Bonnie & Klepto Clyde (1993)
  • Snowtown (2011)
  • Afterschool (2008)
  • Adventureland (2009)
  • Roger Dodger (2002)
  • Igby Goes Down (2002)

Sunday, 18 February 2024

How to Hypnotize


Hypnosis is the misdirection of attention and focus ''think of ur toe''

Say IMAGINE, PICTURE, FOCUS, BELIEVE, FEEL, EMBRACE, ACCEPT

Focus on image
Say whats gonna happen
Mention the experience
Turn their focus to what ur saying (do u feel a sensation in ur feet etc...) shift their consciousness

Emotional persuasion u need to bypass the conscious mind:
*Who's gonna be the 1st person to notice you've stopped smoking
*since ur going to the store go to the bank for me
*our country is in trouble, everythings a mess, we are in a mess, thats why i need to be president'!
(Truth,truth,truth, command)

Manson
Do u love ur world?
Would u give ur life for ur world?

The mind takes the facts, it runs them through feelings and comes up with judgements

He hasnt been 100% honest with u, he hasnt been happy

Psychometry - token-object reading, or psychoscopy, is a form of extrasensory perception characterized by the claimed ability to make relevant associations from an object of unknown history by making physical contact with that object

What is the nature of the human condition?
People have the desire to think they r better than others, they look for reasons to appear superior
How often do u stop and ask if ur justified to think that ur smarter than someone else?
Construct the situation - trigger the bahaviour - watch them step into ur trap

In what situation would their characteristics benefit my goals
Outspokeness, low self esteem, naive, trusting, contrarian, emphatic quality

Speak in a low, slow, soothing, voice. Take your time when talking, keeping your voice calm and collected. Draw out your sentences a little longer than usual. Imagine you are trying to calm down a frightened or worrying person, letting your voice be an example. Keep this tone of voice throughout the entire interaction. Some good words to start with include:

• "Let my words wash over you, and take the suggestions as you desire them."

• "Everything here is safe, calm, and peaceful. Let yourself sink into the couch/chair as your relax deeply."

• "Your eyes may feel heavy and want to close. Let your body sink naturally down as your muscles relax. Listen to your body and my voice as you begin to feel calm."

• "You are in complete control of this time. You will only accept those suggestions which are for your benefit and that you are willing to accept."

Suggestions
• "You can feel your eyelids getting heavy. Let them drift and fall."

• "You are letting yourself slip deeper and deeper into a calm, peaceful trance.

• "You can feel yourself relaxing now. You can feel a heavy, relaxed feeling coming over you. And as I continue to talk, that heavy relaxed feeling will get stronger and stronger, until it carries you into a deep, peaceful state of relaxation."

• "Every word that I utter is putting you faster and deeper, and faster and deeper, into a calm, peaceful state of relaxation."

• "Sinking down, and shutting down. Sinking down, and shutting down. Sinking down, and shutting down, shutting down completely."

• "And the deeper you go, the deeper you are able to go. And the deeper you go, the deeper you want to go, and the more enjoyable the experience becomes."
•
Here’s a closer look at his bag of techniques for rigging the game – his gimmickry:

1. Phatic Communication - What were we thinking? Why weren’t we paying attention? Now then, now then”, “How’s about that then”, “Now then, Now then” “Gather round” “Guys and gals” ''Jinggle janggle''

2. Rhythm: Power, Effect & the Paradiddles

3. Terror-Eyes to Terrorise - make the whites of ur eyes show by bulging ur eyes

4. Legerdemain: The art of misdirection - In addition to manual dexterity, sleight of hand depends on the use of psychology, timing, misdirection, and natural choreography in accomplishing a magical effect. Misdirection is perhaps the most important component of the art of sleight of hand. The magician choreographs his actions so that all spectators are likely to look where he or she wants them to. More importantly, they do not look where the performer does not wish them to look. Two types of misdirection are timing and movement. A phrase often used is “A larger action covers a smaller action.” Care must be taken however to not make the larger action so big that it becomes suspect.”

There has been a whole school of argument that hypnosis is nothing more than an exaggerated form of social compliance. This is evidence that they are not just telling you what they think you want to hear. They are actually perceiving things differently. That is a very important lesson."

Derren Brown
*You'll notice that your eyes start to get heavy as u listen to me
*You can wonder how deeply you are going into a trance
*As u sit there i want you to notice that ur body is growing heavier
*feel me enhancing the trance
*As u sit there reading these words try not to scratch
*As u sit there, and as u, despite ur enviroment, really focus on these words, and as u carry in reading this page, and the more u try not to think about it, the more u'll notice the feeling of wanting to scratch

*DESCRIBE WHAT THEY ARE DOING FIRST, WHAT YOU ARE OBSERVING THEM DOING: as u sit there, reading these words, trying not to scratch ur arm etc....
Pacing & leading: As you X, so you Y
The 1st piece of behaviour is true & then you mention the desired outcome
''As you sleep, you will dream about me''

*Here's 3 pacing statements and 1 leading statement
''Feel the temperature in the room, listen to my voice, as ur aware of chair ur sitting in - u can begin to relax"
Or
''Thinking back on all ur past problems u might find a solution today''

Vague Language such as:
NOMINALIZATION
A noun with no phisical form:
Problem, depression, understanding, enpowerment, excitment, love, connection, skill
UNSPECIFIED VERB
Travel, move, relocate, transform,
NEGATION LANGUAGE (creates confusion)
I dont know, it doesnt matter, i5s not important, dont focus, i dont know if u can,
NEGATE & COMMAND
''I dont know if u can LISTEN intensely'
''It's not important to FOCUS ur attention''

As you sit there listening to my words, with your eyes closed, feeling your hands on the chair, allowing my words to relax you as your breathing becomes regular and peaceful. Id like you to let ur self begin to drift away into a kind of sleep

As you listen to my voice and look up at my watch, watching it as u relax in the chair, you'll notice that your eyes start to grow heavy as u listen to me. Thats right - and as u notice them blinking, so too you can keep listening to me as you relax and as you allow them to grow heavier. As the rest of you relaxes in the chair so your eyes get heavier and you blink more and more and just allow them to close so that you can drift off into a sleep

USE IMAGERY
If u are talking about a garden let them hear, feel, smell, see and taste the surroundings.
Hear the birds sing in the trees, feel the grass under their feet, smell of the flowers. Make it a multi-sensory experience, they can feel the sun in their face.

HYPNOSIS STRUCTURE
*prepare subject for the trance by using suggestions and eye closure, utilize the subjects expectations and beliefs. Have them breath normally then tense their muscles, hold it and then relax their muscles. Tell them they are sinking into their chair as their body grows heavier with relaxation.
''And as ur body grows heavier and your breathing becomes relaxed and regular, so too you can listen to me as you sink down in the chair and let ur self drift off comfortably.''
Or have them look at a swinging watch and tell them their eyes are growing heavier
*deepen the trance by using a metaphor such as walking down some stairs. Tell them each step down will relax them more amd more, we r going to delve into ur subcontious and they r in a safe place
''you r now going deeper into ur trance, u will hear and understand everything I say. U will be aware of your self going into a trance. I will count from 1 to 10 as you walk down the stairs. Once i reach 10 you will be at the bottom of the stairs and in a profound state of relaxation. AS i count, AS u take each step, AS you breath, AS you listen to me, SO each step, each number, each word will take you deeper. U can return to the staircase anytime u want to.''
*carry out hypnotic work. Tell them they will see 5 coloured doors, what colours do they see, pick a door and enter.''
Or u can simply describe what they see behind the door 'a garden' and describe the experience to them. Tell them they can always return to the garden as a safe place. Suggest to them that there is a chair in the garden in the perfect spot and to sit in it. Say that their right arm is heavy as it rests on the arm chair. You try and lift your arm but you cant because u r so relaxed. ''Try to unstick ur arm from the chair''. If they cant unstick their arm from the chair but tries to that means they are the best subject for suggestability and is responsive. If they do lift their arm treat it like a success ''Excellent, and as u notice how heavy ur arm is you gently rest it and let it take you down now even deeper into a state of total relaxation. Let go of all ur tensions and fears and relax even more.''
No tell them their other arm is getting lighter like a helium balloon and all the tension vanishes from their arm. You can even make them float away in the sky. Pace the feeling of the hand coming away from the chair, pace, lead and suggest the arm rising up to the sky. Then have the arm gently lower and as it touches the arm chair it sinks them even deeper into a trance. ''See you hand come up to ur face as u sit in the garden, feel ur hand touch ur face. Once it does you will drift off into an even more profound and comfortable trance, u will feel dreamy and maybe start to levitate. Tell them that in the future they can return to this special place by going down the staircase and entering the door to the garden in order to relax, lie in the grass and re-experience these wonderful sensations and feelings. Use this regularly so it locks into ur mind otherwise it will be difficult to bring back.
*awaken the subject. Have them leave the garden and walk back up the stair case slowly counting from 10 to 0 as the reach the top of the stairs. As they reach zero openur eyes and feel the drowsiness slip away.
*make sure the subject is free of any suggestion and no longer hypnotically responsive

Cold reading
Feelings, deep down, on the inside
Often, rarely, occasionally
Never use: never & always
Create an out: ''Sometimes you hide things & occasionally u reveal too much''

*Bring ur mind to the present
*Look them in the eye (if their eyes r darting it means they want to escape from the conversation or topic) - if they look straight at u they r interested in ur thoughts
*if they eyebrows go down while they look away they might be thinking hard or worried about something else
*if the eyebrows go up and eyes go big then they r curious about what u say
*if pupils go big they like u, excited and happy

The unknown side of the human psyche

''The more u REMEMBER the RELAXATION within, the more u notice the COMFORT through your arms and people really begin to RELAX deeply and more comfortably when they start to LET GO and REST'


I like ur style
I appretiate you
When can i see u again?
Great sense of humour/brains/personality
I got this babe/ i'll take care of it
YOU got this baby
You look extra beautiful
Good memory
Fill u with more children
Ur the perfect mix of cute and sexy

Your my hearts breath****
Sensational
Enchanting
Ur a precious package
I like ur perspective
Marvalous

Luminous, exotic, lovely, erotic, radiant

The plot of female hero myth is she tames a mysterious & agressive male (vampire,wolf, surgeon, millionaire,pirate)
Women want to tame but then lose interest in u once tamed

I can see ur soul

EMBEDDED COMMANDS & SUGGESTIONS
*remember when....imagine how.....in the future.....picture....recall.....feel...allow...
visualise
*allow your self to feel
*do u feel ready
*allow it to happen
*allow ur self to take action tonight
Its happening in ur mind....
Thats occuring when u imagine....
Its taking place
Its on
Make me feel welcome
Bliss
Accepting of me
U make me feel comfortable
I could feel their innocence
I understand ur passions

TURN ON TOPICS
*transcendence, awe, mystery, identity, edge, novelty, surprise, being dominated, partner in crime, secrets, secret location, love, people watching
Tension, indulgence, gravitating to people, magnetic qualities, adventure, rituals & courtships, emotional roller coaster
Passion, intrigue, control
Teacher, vivid imagination, receive, master, learn, fascination, tender, challenges, her process,

*Which quality would you pick to have in ur life to make it all worthwhile?
*what does that allow u to do in life?
*how does that make you feel inside?
* what would be a perfect scenario for you to feel happy?
*what emotion do you feel inside?
*what will bring you closer to that feeling?
*what do you like doing?

Do you have the time?
Can i ask u a question wheres the best pub around here to go drinking cose im not from around here?
R u single by any chance?
Can i have ur number?

I'll think about it
I ll tell u later

Ur my fav person to talk to / to spend time with
I could talk to u all night long
Ive learned so much from talking with u
U look amazing as always
Thats a good joke ur pretty funny
Ur not like anyone ive ever met before
Ur really good at what u do
I feel like im so much better when im with u
U have such incredible hair/ lips/eyes
I admire ur work ethic
What do u think?

You've been activated
That must have been so traumatic for you
You're special